Ulaganayagan Kamal Haasan has shifted his focus towards films. His next venture Vikram, which was announced recently has hit the floors today in Chennai. Kamal Haasan and Makkal Selvan Vijay Sethupathi have joined the sets.
Director Lokesh Kanakaraj, who created a sensation with Khaidi, will direct Vikram. The film also stars talented Mollywood actor Fahad Fazil, who is a most wanted actor now. He is playing a baddie in Icon Star Allu Arjun’s Pushpa, a Pan-India project.
As per the reports, Vikram, touted to be an action thriller will complete the shooting formalities by 2021 end and the film will be made ready for the release next year.
The poster released that has Kamal Haasan, Vijay Sethupathi and Fahad Fazil has took the social media like a storm and the meme pages are using their creativity and editing the pic with the heroes they like.
On the work front, Kamal Haasan is busy shooting for the much-awaited Indian 2, the sequel of Indian. Director Shankar, known for giving social messages with commercial films, is directing the film. He directed the Indian too.
Kamal Haasan has tried his luck in politics in the recent general elections in Tamil Nadu. However, he failed to create any impact in the elections and he himself couldn’t win the elections.
He contested from the Coimbatore South constituency and lost to Vanathi Srinivasan, BJP candidate. While Vanathi Srinivasan got 53,209 votes, Kamal Haasan received 51,481 votes. Such a close call.
Indian 2 shooting got delayed with the Covid impact and the issues between director and producer. Shankar announced two more projects, one with Ram Charan and the second is with Ranveer Singh, the Bollywood remake of Anniyan.
The producers are not happy with Shankar announcing other projects without completing Indian 2, which is being made on a big scale without compromising.
The producers have moved the Madras High Court seeking directives to either complete Indian 2 shooting before starting other projects or deposit the amount as a security deposit.
Hearing the case, the court refused to issue such orders to the director and quashed the petition